AI test automation for every release

Replace days of clicking before every release

Your QA team runs the same hundreds of test cases by hand before each release, and the automated suite breaks every time the UI changes. Agents turn each manual case into an end-to-end test that runs in your CI pipeline, and repair the suite when screens move.

YOU HAND OVERRelease 4.2 regression · 212 manual cases
e2e · checkout-regressionRead cases…
53/ 212Reading manual test casesCI RUN
TC-014Guest checkout with a saved cardsteps in a spreadsheetManual
TC-027Apply a coupon to a discounted itemsteps in a spreadsheetManual
TC-041Change delivery address at paymentsteps in a spreadsheetManual
TC-058Declined card shows a retry optionsteps in a spreadsheetManual
TC-073Gift card covers part of the totalsteps in a spreadsheetManual
1Read cases
2Automate
3Run
4Wire CI
YOU GET212 cases running in CIRuns in your CI pipeline, not by hand
Built by Syncfusion, serving 47,000+ organizations.25+ years of developer tools, now reimagined for the agent-first era.
47,000+Syncfusion customers
1,600+Syncfusion UI components
25+Years of Syncfusion developer tools
Syncfusion component licensing is separate.
From case to test

Turn manual cases into end-to-end tests

The agent reads each case the way a tester would: the steps, the data, and the result to check. It writes one end-to-end test per case, runs it three times in a sandbox browser, and asks QA about any step that has no expected result.

Case steps become test actionsEach step becomes one action in the test, in the same order.
Test dataData from the case is created by the test, never borrowed from production.
Expected resultsEach expected result becomes an assertion. No result, no guess: QA gets a question.
TC-027 · manual test case
1Open checkout as a guestdata: cart with 2 itemsexpect: Checkout page shows 2 items
2Enter the coupon codedata: SPRING10expect: Total drops by 10%
3Pay with a saved carddata: Visa test cardexpect: Order confirmation shown
4Check the order emaildata: guest inboxexpect: — missing
coupon.stacking.spec.ts · written by agent
test('coupon applies to a discounted item', async ({ page }) => {await page.goto('/checkout?guest=1') // expect: Checkout page shows 2 itemsawait page.getByLabel('Coupon code').fill('SPRING10') // expect: Total drops by 10%await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Pay now' }).click() // expect: Order confirmation shown? Step 4 needs an expected result. Asked QA instead of guessing.})
Writing step 1 of 4…
The clock

Run regression cases in your CI pipeline

Manual regression blocks a release week and still skips cases when time runs out. The automated suite runs every case in your CI pipeline like any other suite, so a broken coupon fails a test before it reaches review.

  1. 01Runs in your pipelineThe tests run in your CI pipeline like any other suite, so regression is no longer a week before release.
  2. 02Trace each test to its manual caseEach test is named after its manual case, so QA can still trace coverage.
  3. 03Your QA team decidesPeople still own what to test. Agents do the clicking.
Illustrative example
Release 4.2 · full regression, 212 casesMonTueWed
By handFour testers, release week blocked0 of 212 clicked
In CIIn your CI pipeline, like any other suite0 of 212 run
14 minper full run
in CInot once a release
212cases in every run
After a redesign

Repair outdated tests and report genuine bugs

A redesign can break dozens of end-to-end tests at once, and most of them are just out of date. The agent sorts every failure: stale tests get repaired and real regressions get reported with the failing test as evidence.

Selectors based on roles and labelsRepairs use roles and labels, not CSS paths that break on the next redesign.
Report the bug with its failing testA test that catches a real regression isn’t rewritten to pass. The bug is reported with the test as evidence.
Ask QA before changing unclear behaviorWhen the intended behavior is unclear, the agent asks QA before changing a test.
checkout redesign · 18 tests failingSORTING 0 OF 18
✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗✗
TEST OUT OF DATE · REPAIREDpage.locator('#btn-pay-2')page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Pay now' })
0out of date, repaired
0real bugs, reported with evidence
The same day, twice

How Ines moves checkout regression into CI

Illustrative example, not a customer result.

Here is what the work looks like today, and what changes when an AI team takes the busywork off the plate.

Without BoldCreateWith BoldCreate
09:00
Release week starts. 212 manual test cases are split across four testers.3 days blocked
Ines hands the regression spreadsheet to an agent.10 minutes of setup
11:30
A redesign moved the checkout buttons. 18 automated tests fail overnight.Suite muted
The 18 broken tests are sorted: 16 out of date and repaired, 2 real bugs reported.Suite trusted again
15:00
A tester skips the coupon cases to finish on time.Coverage gap
All 212 cases run in the team’s CI pipeline on each pull request.14 min per run
18:00
A coupon bug reaches production the next morning.Hotfix release
The coupon bug fails a test before merge.Caught in review
Three days of manual regression handed back every release

Frequently asked questions

How do agents turn manual test cases into test automation?
The agent reads each case’s steps, data, and expected result and writes one end-to-end test per case, named after the manual case. Each test runs three times in a sandbox browser.
What if a test case has no expected result?
The agent doesn’t guess. QA gets a question for any step without an expected result.
What happens when a redesign breaks the suite?
The agent sorts every failure. Out-of-date tests are repaired with selectors based on roles and labels, and real regressions are reported with the failing test as evidence.
Where does the automated suite run?
The CLI runs it on every pull request in your CI pipeline. Your QA team still decides what to test.

Hand over one regression spreadsheet

Pick the flow your QA team clicks through most. Review the automated suite and the open questions as a pull request.

$199 a month for 20 seats · AI and sandboxes at provider cost + 10% platform fee