Accessibility compliance with AI agents

Address four hundred audit findings with one fix per component

Accessibility is now a legal requirement in many markets, and the European Accessibility Act has applied since June 2025. Audits come back with hundreds of issues nobody has time for. Agents trace each one to the component that causes it, fix it once, and every screen that uses it follows.

YOU HAND OVERAudit: 412 issues across 37 screens
a11y · customer-portalScan…
412open WCAG 2.2 AA issuesScanning screens · 9 of 37
1.3.1DatePickerNo label on the input—
4.1.2Button (icon)No accessible name—
1.4.3Brand colorsText contrast 3.1:1—
2.1.2ModalFocus trapped, no Escape—
1.1.1Product imageMissing alt text—
2.4.3Form layoutFocus order jumps—
1Scan
2Group
3Fix
4Recheck
YOU GET412 findings closed by 19 fixesWCAG 2.2 AA · every screen rechecked
Built by Syncfusion, serving 47,000+ organizations.25+ years of developer tools, now reimagined for the agent-first era.
47,000+Syncfusion customers
1,600+Syncfusion UI components
25+Years of Syncfusion developer tools
Syncfusion component licensing is separate.
The audit

Connect accessibility findings to their WCAG criteria

Automated scans catch contrast, labels, and missing text alternatives. The agent adds what scans miss, then pins each finding to the exact element with the WCAG criterion it breaks, so nobody has to interpret a 90-page report. Agent checks support, but don’t replace, a formal accessibility audit.

PerceivableContrast, text alternatives, labels
OperableKeyboard access, focus order, no traps
UnderstandableClear errors and instructions
RobustRoles and names screen readers can read
portal/sign-up · WCAG 2.2 AA0 ISSUES OPEN
Choose your plan
alt=""
We’ll email your policy documents.
Date of birth
DD / MM / YYYY
Tab order: 1. Email2. Submit3. Date
  • #1 OPEN · WCAG 1.4.3Hint text contrast 2.8:1
  • #2 OPEN · WCAG 1.3.1Date field has no label
  • #3 OPEN · WCAG 1.1.1Product image has no alt text
  • #4 OPEN · WCAG 2.4.3Tab jumps from Email to Submit
Beyond the scanner

Check keyboard behavior beyond automated scans

A form can pass every automated check and still lock a keyboard user inside a dialog. The agent walks each screen the way people who can’t use a mouse do, and records exactly where it gets stuck.

  1. 01Keyboard onlyEvery screen is walked with Tab, Enter, and Escape, no mouse.
  2. 02Focus you can seeThe agent checks the focus ring is visible on every control.
  3. 03Check dialog exit and focus returnEscape closes it and focus returns to where you were.
Keyboard only · beforeWALKING THE FORM
NameFOCUS
Email
Plan
Read the terms
Submit
Terms of coverPolicy wording, exclusions, and cooling-off period.
Accept
Close
Key pressed: TabFocused: Name
Fix once

Trace repeated findings to a common component

The same date picker fails on every screen that uses it. The agent fixes it once, in the component, and rechecks every screen. Where a Syncfusion component already does the job accessibly, it swaps the custom one out.

Repair the component behind repeated findingsFindings are grouped by the component behind them, so one change repairs every screen that uses it.
Evidence on each pull requestEach fix lists the WCAG criterion it closes, with before and after results.
Review accessibility before merging any UI pull requestEach UI pull request can recheck the screens it touches and flag only the issues it introduces.
DatePicker · one componentFIXING+ aria-label="Date of birth"
+ arrow keys move by day, Page Up by month
0 of 37 screens fixed96 issues closed
  • Quotenot fixed
  • Claimsnot fixed
  • Renewalnot fixed
  • Profilenot fixed
  • Billingnot fixed
  • Travelnot fixed
  • Petsnot fixed
  • Homenot fixed
  • Autonot fixed
  • Lifenot fixed
  • Healthnot fixed
  • Docsnot fixed
  • Inboxnot fixed
  • Paymentsnot fixed
  • Refundsnot fixed
  • Agentsnot fixed
  • Searchnot fixed
  • Reportsnot fixed
  • Auditnot fixed
  • Usersnot fixed
  • Rolesnot fixed
  • Settingsnot fixed
  • Helpnot fixed
  • Chatnot fixed
  • Noticesnot fixed
  • Dashboardnot fixed
  • Leadsnot fixed
  • Policiesnot fixed
  • Brokersnot fixed
  • Importsnot fixed
  • Exportsnot fixed
  • Calendarnot fixed
  • Tasksnot fixed
  • Notesnot fixed
  • Contractsnot fixed
  • Partnersnot fixed
  • Sign-upnot fixed
The same day, twice

Sofia groups portal findings by component

Illustrative example, not a customer result.

Here is what the work looks like today, and what changes when an AI team takes the busywork off the plate.

Without BoldCreateWith BoldCreate
09:00
The external audit lands: 412 issues across the customer portal.412 issues
Sofia hands the audit to an agent.10 minutes of setup
11:00
Engineers fix the first screen by hand. The same date picker fails on 36 more.Same bug, 37 times
Findings are grouped by component: 412 issues trace back to 19.19 fixes, not 412
15:00
A release adds a modal with no keyboard exit.New issue shipped
Sofia asks the agent to check the new modal before it merges.Caught before merge
17:30
Legal asks for a remediation date. Nobody can give one.No plan
A recheck shows every screen and its status, ready for legal.Date committed
Weeks of screen-by-screen fixes turned into nineteen pull requests

Frequently asked questions

How do agents handle an accessibility compliance audit?
Agents check every screen against WCAG 2.2 AA and pin each finding to the exact element and the criterion it breaks. Findings are grouped by component, so one fix repairs every screen that uses it.
Do agents find issues automated scans miss?
They can catch some. Besides the automated checks, the agent walks each screen with the keyboard only, using Tab, Enter, and Escape, and checks focus order, visible focus, keyboard traps, and labels. Agent checks support, but don’t replace, a formal accessibility audit.
What does each accessibility fix show?
Each pull request lists the WCAG criterion it closes, with before and after results, and every screen that uses the component is rechecked.
How do we keep new accessibility issues out?
Each UI pull request can recheck the screens it touches, and only the issues it introduces are flagged. A Cloud Agent automation can run the check whenever a pull request opens or is updated.

Send us your last accessibility audit

We map it to your components. Approve the spec for one, review the fix as a tested pull request, and your team merges it.

$199 a month for 20 seats · AI and sandboxes at provider cost + 10% platform fee